this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
-6 points (35.0% liked)

Ask Solarpunk

106 readers
12 users here now

Welcome to c/AskSolarpunk @ slrpnk.net!

A Fediverse community to ask slrpnk.net open-ended, thought provoking questions.



Rules: (interactive)

We respect the basic rules of the SLRPNK server:

be constructive
there is no need of another internet space full of competition, negativity, rage etc.;
no bigotry
including racism, sexism, ableism, transphobia, homophobia or xenophobia;

be empathic
empathy is more rebellious than a middle finger;

no porn and no gore
let’s keep this place easy to manage;

no ads / spamming / flooding
we don’t want to buy/consume your commodified ideas;

occasional self-promotion
by active members is fine.



Related Communities

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 

We need altcoins as long as we interact economically over the net, with people we do not know (or simply with people outside our local communities). If we try to imagine what qualities a "solarpunk coin" should have, what are your thoughts? Do we know any existing coin, checking all boxes? This question is more about political economy of Solarpunk, then its technology.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ex_06@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

I don’t like the idea of a single coin

But one coin generated for hosting a platform, one coin for piracy, one coin for cooperatives etc seems the way to go

Oh right, also one coin for UBI

As per now, I struggle in imagining a layer one chain to support all of these. Probably it would make more sense to stay on eth and eventually move? I’m not sure.

[–] Petros@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

So, do I understand you correctly that we are talking about several "tokens" based on the same chain? I know there are some open chain frameworks (ETH is waaay too capitalist for my liking) that could be utilised - after diligent scrutiny.

Meanwhile, in another subthread, we got to (probably central) question, whether basic risks: double-spending and forgery, could be addressed without blockchain, in a publicly transparent and verifiable way.

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Blockchain is just another name for a public (distributed/shared) ledger. Due to scaling and privacy issues of that, this method is inherently unsuited for direct payment use, but it could be useful for an inter-bank exchange market of local currencies.

[–] Petros@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago

...which is ideally / eventually the usecase for the coin I am thinking about.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)