this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
38 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

8 readers
1 users here now

@politics on kbin.social is a magazine to share and discuss current events news, opinion/analysis, videos, or other informative content related to politicians, politics, or policy-making at all levels of governance (federal, state, local), both domestic and international. Members of all political perspectives are welcome here, though we run a tight ship. Community guidelines and submission rules were co-created between the Mod Team and early members of @politics. Please read all community guidelines and submission rules carefully before engaging our magazine.

founded 2 years ago
 

A national group of sheriffs that claims the top law enforcers in American counties are not bound by federal law has successfully spread its doctrine to dozens of states in recent years.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mister_monster@monero.town 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (11 children)

It all started with the legalize marijuana movement, now we are here.

Do you want local governance or top down governance from a thousand miles away? At what distance does it become colonialism? States are not required to enforce federal law, they just can't violate the constitution.

[–] FfaerieOxide@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I think Good Things are good, Bad Things are bad, and violence should be used to make more of the first thing and less of the second thing.

An overseer torturing an enslaved worker on a plantation is "local governance".
The 54th Massachusetts Infantry shooting that overseer through the head and heart like Peter Weller 22 minutes into RoboCop is "top down governance from a thousand miles away".

The location of a government is not what makes it inherently good or bad, it's what that government does.

Killing slavers—lest there be confusion—is good.

[–] elscallr@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What about the FBI and the airforce bombing black neighborhoods in 1985? Like literally bombing them. Was that the kind of top down governance you want?

[–] FfaerieOxide@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, what makes you think I want that kind of governance?

I have already said Good Things are good and Bad Things are bad.

Fascist sheriffs: Bad
Bombing the MOVE building: Bad

What in the phrase

it's what that government does.

reads in any way as support for Philadelphia pigs bombing people?

If anything it reads to me as firmly against that sort of thing.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)