this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
84 points (98.8% liked)

Ukraine

8167 readers
487 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants in any form is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.


Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://www.flightradar24.com/data/flights/sum9122

No explanation yet for what caused this.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)
[–] LaFinlandia@sopuli.xyz 33 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

The ground speed rose very quickly before it disappeared, so it may have just defected from the air.

[–] Know_not_Scotty_does@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago

The plane fell out of a window and shot itself in the back of the head 4 times on the way down while its arms were tied behind its back.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Loss of lift is Western propaganda. Greatest Russian planes never crash, they only land unexpectedly!

[–] lemmylommy@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago

Special landing operation

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

But the altitude didn’t show a change

[–] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Can that specific plane even go near that fast without descending? The data may not be accurate, 900 mph in level flight is tough for a jet that size. Even at altitude.

It's possible the altitude is no longer accurate at the point on the speed graph that looks like a stall. But it's also possible the speed graph is no longer accurate at some point. If they are both accurate, the data doesn't make sense. It's most likely that at the point of the stall where it hit 33k feet, since the altimeter never changes again despite the wild fluctuations in speed after, it stopped accurately being read.

Maybe some electronics gave out at that point.

load more comments (4 replies)